🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.